]]> What could this mean? Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. To obtain Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection Because it was sitting in my barn / shop for over 12 years!! Alternatively, they may be considering that you submit to another journal within Nature, where there may be a better match. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Editors, on the other hand, must guard against a different category of mistake, as it is their responsibility to balance the intense investment of the authors in a particular decision against the more diffuse interests not only of their readers but also of other authors. The paper is rejected because the referees have raised considerable technical objections and/or the authors claim has not been adequately established. Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a [CDATA[// >Decisions, decisions | Nature Neuroscience No products in the cart. In a competitive world, as Gore Vidal put it, It is not enough to succeed. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? [CDATA[// >